Advances in Decision Sciences
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 546547, 29 pages
doi:10.1155/2010/546547
Research Article

A Theoretical Argument Why the t-Copula Explains Credit Risk Contagion Better than the Gaussian Copula

1IMD, 1001 Lausanne, Switzerland
2Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USA
3Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand

Received 19 December 2009; Accepted 23 February 2010

Academic Editor: Chin Lai

Copyright © 2010 Didier Cossin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

One of the key questions in credit dependence modelling is the specfication of the copula function linking the marginals of default variables. Copulae functions are important because they allow to decouple statistical inference into two parts: inference of the marginals and inference of the dependence. This is particularly important in the area of credit risk where information on dependence is scant. Whereas the techniques to estimate the parameters of the copula function seem to be fairly well established, the choice of the copula function is still an open problem. We find out by simulation that the t-copula naturally arises from a structural model of credit risk, proposed by Cossin and Schellhorn (2007). If revenues are linked by a Gaussian copula, we demonstrate that the t-copula provides a better fit to simulations than does a Gaussian copula. This is done under various specfications of the marginals and various configurations of the network. Beyond its quantitative importance, this result is qualitatively intriguing. Student's t-copulae induce fatter (joint) tails than Gaussian copulae ceteris paribus. On the other hand observed credit spreads have generally fatter joint tails than the ones implied by the Gaussian distribution. We thus provide a new statistical explanation why (i) credit spreads have fat joint tails, and (ii) financial crises are amplified by network effects.